Johnson’s 3-year UK spending master plan set to be ditched


Boris Johnson’s hopes of regaining the political initiative this autumn by setting out a three-year spending master plan for the rest of the parliament are set to be abandoned.

Rishi Sunak, the chancellor, has told the prime minister that plans for a comprehensive review — setting out spending totals across Whitehall — should not go ahead amid the chaos of Covid-19.

The issue has created tensions between the two neighbours in Downing Street and intensive negotiations have been going on over the past week, including on Tuesday night, on whether any compromise could be found.

A decision to scrap the three-year review in favour of a stopgap single-year settlement would be a setback for Mr Johnson, who saw the event as a chance to map out his priorities for a post-Covid world.

It would also be a disappointment for defence chiefs, who wanted certainty on how to plan for a new era of changing threats against the backdrop of tight budgetary constraints.

Mr Johnson and Mr Sunak have been discussing whether anything can be salvaged from the aborted exercise and whether any key departments — such as the Ministry of Defence — could still be given a multiyear settlement.

One option would be to publish the separate “integrated review” of defence and foreign policy — setting out the UK’s priorities — without fixing a multiyear defence budget.

News of plans to scrap the multiyear spending review were confirmed by several people close to the process on Tuesday night. Downing Street and the Treasury declined to comment.

READ  Wells Fargo pays $6.5 million to Navajo Nation over 'predatory' practices

One person briefed on the talks said: “You could have a one-year ‘health and prosperity’ focused spending review. But it’s a disaster for the military who are already running billions short of cash.”

Launching the integrated review in February, Mr Johnson called it the biggest analysis of the UK’s defence policy since the end of the cold war, promising it would set a new strategy for “global Britain” while revolutionising procurement. 

The MoD, which is grappling with a £13bn shortfall in its equipment budget, is agitating for a multiyear financial settlement alongside the review that would rebalance its spending commitments and allow for military modernisation to take the armed forces into a new era of technological warfare.

Service chiefs are keen for political leaders to sign off a costed plan that would retire some traditional equipment to allow investment in autonomous ships, drones and cyber defences.

Defence officials say they need to be able to budget for the long term. “Without this certainty, you lose all the longer-term financial planning that will put us at a strategic advantage,” one defence official said. 

Publishing a high-level version of the integrated review even without spending plans would allow Downing Street to articulate a clear post-Brexit foreign policy at a time of significant international uncertainty. The Covid-19 pandemic, growing espionage threat from hostile powers and rising tempo of cyber attacks that fall below the threshold of formal armed conflict have all increased the risks to UK security, say defence and intelligence officials.

Aerospace and aviation executives have been lobbying government for a dedicated support package both to survive what will be a difficult winter and to help the industry meet the target of net zero carbon emissions by 2050. 

READ  Facebook executive meets with U.S. lawmakers to discuss privacy

Both France and Germany have bailed out their national airlines and, in addition, announced longer-term multibillion-euro aid packages for the development of electric and hydrogen technology.

Meanwhile, the UK has not provided any sector-specific support, prompting fears that British companies will lose competitiveness at a time when aircraft technology is changing rapidly. The UK has already slipped from having the second biggest share of the global aerospace market to third place behind France. 

The MoD put its bids into the Treasury 10 days ago and is now in tense negotiations on the terms of its deal. Ministers privately have made clear that since defence equipment plans can last anywhere between a year and 25 years, a multiyear settlement is crucial for procurement and effective planning.

One industry executive involved in talks with ministers on an economic recovery plan said: “The problem with delaying [the spending review] is that it will completely stall any of the midterm investments that will enable business to recover.” Those could include some of Mr Johnson’s longer-term green energy plans.



READ SOURCE

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here