How Long Will This Last?


This article is part of David Leonhardt’s newsletter. You can sign up here to receive it each weekday.

“The higher the peak, the longer it lasts,” Tom Frieden, a former head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, told me yesterday.

Frieden’s point was that a local surge in coronavirus cases isn’t only a short-term emergency that can overwhelm the health care system and cause otherwise preventable deaths. A short-term surge also leads to more cases over the long term, by producing more people who transmit the virus to others.

For these reasons, the fact that the virus’s spread appears to be slowing in New York State, as Gov. Andrew Cuomo said yesterday, is very good news. It also seems to have slowed recently in California and Washington State.

The slowdown reflects the social distancing that has been happening in these places over the past two weeks. Yet even if the slowdown persists, it is far, far too early to be optimistic about the virus’s trajectory.

For one thing, serious symptoms trail new infections by several days or more. The number of deaths in New York and nationwide is likely to spike over the next week. At a single hospital in Queens yesterday, 13 people died — a scene that Ashley Bray, a doctor there, described as “apocalyptic.” The coming spike in hospitalizations could easily overwhelm hospitals, especially because of the shortage of medical equipment.

For another, not every part of the country has engaged in rigorous social distancing. Cases in Republican-leaning states, especially in the South, are now growing more quickly than in Democratic-leaning states, as Nate Silver noted yesterday. One likely reason is that many Republicans, taking their cues from President Trump and some other party leaders, still don’t view the virus as a threat, as polls show. My colleague Jennifer Senior argues that other states are different from New York more in timing than degree: “The idea that New York is an exception rather than a harbinger is madness,” she writes.

READ  Getting Real About Rural America

Whatever happens over the next week or two, the country still has no viable way to start functioning normally again without a huge increase in testing. Even if new cases slow, the return of typical activity will cause new outbreaks. “Testing will allow us to isolate the infected so they can’t infect others,” Aaron Carroll and Ashish Jha, both medical school professors, wrote in The Atlantic.

Or as Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director general of the World Health Organization, said yesterday: “Asking people to stay at home and shutting down population movement is buying time and reducing the pressure on health systems. But on their own, these measures will not extinguish epidemics.”

All of which means that the wishful optimism Trump continues to express has little basis in reality. Opening up the economy in the next couple of weeks — even under the best circumstances — would likely lead to more sickness, more death and ultimately a deeper economic downturn.

And when the economy does reopen, we will need to be prepared for new outbreaks, because no testing regimen will be perfect. Those new outbreaks will require new bouts of social distancing. “It’s likely, then, that the new coronavirus will be a lingering part of American life for at least a year, if not much longer,” Ed Yong of The Atlantic writes in an excellent overview of what to expect.

The Argument

In the new episode, Ross Douthat, Michelle Goldberg and I talk about Ross’s experience of being tested for the virus, and we debate the policy response from Washington.

READ  US weekly jobless claims race to a more than 2-year high

If you are not a subscriber to this newsletter, you can subscribe here. You can also join me on Twitter (@DLeonhardt) and Facebook.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.





READ SOURCE

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here